We are a multidisciplinary fellowship researching threats to life at its beginning and natural end.
Oral arguments were heard Wednesday in the McCullen v. Coackley case before the Supreme Court. The dispute is about a Massachusetts law which prohibits non-clinic employees from side-walk counselling within 35 feet of the entrance of a clinic. Amy Howe, of Bloomberg’s Supreme Court blog, seems to think the law will not be upheld, based on her analysis of the oral arguments. Here is an editorial analysis of the case from the National Catholic Register.
Authors publishing with UFFL retain their copyrights.
By publishing in ProVita or Life and Learning, authors agree that their work can be shared but neither adapted nor used commercially without their express permission.
The CC-BY-NC-ND copyright acknowledgment and identification of the author is required when sharing material.
Questions? Contact us for any further clarification.