We are a multidisciplinary fellowship researching threats to life at its beginning and natural end.

Paul Linton on Overruling Roe v. Wade

In light of the speculation about the impact of Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination to replace Justice Kennedy, I thought I’d call attention to a good piece by Paul Linton that was published in University Faculty for Life’s 2017 volume. Here is a link to the article. Here is the abstract–

“This paper addresses two issues that would arise upon the overruling of Roe v. Wade: First, whether pregnant women who self-abort or consent to an abortion performed upon them by a third party would likely be subject to prosecution in those States where abortion was illegal. Second, what the legal status of abortion would be in the States. The paper concludes, in Part I, that, based upon our history and experience women would not be prosecuted for abortion, and in Part II, that the immediate consequence of an overruling decision upon the legality of abortion would be very limited.”

UFFL and Copyright

Authors publishing with UFFL retain their copyrights. 

By publishing in ProVita or Life and Learning, authors agree that their work can be shared but neither adapted nor used commercially without their express permission. 

The CC-BY-NC-ND copyright acknowledgment and identification of the author is required when sharing material. 

Questions?  Contact us for any further clarification.