We are a multidisciplinary fellowship researching threats to life at its beginning and natural end.

Supreme Court Allows Kentucky AG to Intervene to Defend Pro-Life Law

Here is a link to a Scotusblog report on the Court’s decision in Cameron v. EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C. On March 3, 2022, the Court reversed a Sixth Circuit decision that had refused to allow Daniel Cameron, the Attorney General of Kentucky, to intervene in a suit involving the constitutionality of a Kentucky statute banning dismemberment abortions.

After the Sixth Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling finding the Kentucky statute unconstitutional,  the Kentucky Governor decided not to pursue further efforts to  defend the constitutionality of the statute. Cameron then sought to intervene but the Sixth Circuit  refused to allow intervention. The Supreme Court ruled, by an 8-1 vote, that the Sixth Circuit’s ruling on intervention was in error. The Supreme Court’s decision will allow Cameron to pursue efforts to defend the constitutionality of the Kentucky statute.

The Court’s ruling will help to ensure that pro-life legislation is defended in court, even in situations when the state’s governor doesn’t support the law.

UFFL and Copyright

Authors publishing with UFFL retain their copyrights. 

By publishing in ProVita or Life and Learning, authors agree that their work can be shared but neither adapted nor used commercially without their express permission. 

The CC-BY-NC-ND copyright acknowledgment and identification of the author is required when sharing material. 

Questions?  Contact us for any further clarification.