We are a multidisciplinary fellowship researching threats to life at its beginning and natural end.

Supreme Court Arguments in Kentucky Abortion Case

Here is a link to a Scotusblog report on yesterday’s argument in Cameron v. EMW Women’s Surgical Center. The Kentucky statute bans dismemberment abortions but the Supreme Court arguments were focused on a narrow, albeit important procedural issue. The issue before the Court is–“Whether a state attorney general vested with the power to defend state law should be permitted to intervene after a federal court of appeals invalidates a state statute when no other state actor will defend the law.”

Most observers think that the Court will allow intervention. This is important because such a ruling will help to ensure that pro-life laws passed by a state legislature will be vigorously defended in court, even when the law is not supported by the state’s governor.

UFFL and Copyright

Authors publishing with UFFL retain their copyrights. 

By publishing in ProVita or Life and Learning, authors agree that their work can be shared but neither adapted nor used commercially without their express permission. 

The CC-BY-NC-ND copyright acknowledgment and identification of the author is required when sharing material. 

Questions?  Contact us for any further clarification.