We are a multidisciplinary fellowship researching threats to life at its beginning and natural end.
Here is a link to Ed Whelan’s observations on the Supreme Court’s decision in the chemical abortion case. The Supreme Court found that the pro-life doctors who challenged the FFDA’s approval of access to mifepristone did not have standing to sue. The Court did not, therefore, rule on the merits. Moreover, the Court’s decision relies on the availability of conscience protections for doctors don’t want to participate in chemical abortions.
Authors publishing with UFFL retain their copyrights.
By publishing in ProVita or Life and Learning, authors agree that their work can be shared but neither adapted nor used commercially without their express permission.
The CC-BY-NC-ND copyright acknowledgment and identification of the author is required when sharing material.
Questions? Contact us for any further clarification.